In a surprising twist of events, rumors have surfaced that Elon Musk, the billionaire entrepreneur known for his ventures with Tesla, SpaceX, and Neuralink, has criticized the newly launched perfume line by none other than former President Donald Trump.The fragrance, named “Victory 45-47,” symbolizes Trump’s two terms in office and was introduced with great fanfare in July 2025. However, the product’s unveiling has been overshadowed by claims that Musk, who is said to have a close relationship with Trump, disparaged the perfume’s quality.According to unverified sources, Musk is said to have made disparaging remarks about the scent of Trump’s perfume, describing it as “cheap” and “too industrial.”
He reportedly suggested that the fragrance might appeal to those with a fondness for scents associated with mass-produced, lower-end products, and that it could not compare to the high-end fragrances that Musk is known to prefer. The source of this information has not been officially confirmed, but it has certainly stirred up public curiosity and speculation. This unexpected criticism has set off a firestorm of reactions, particularly since Trump himself has touted the perfume as a symbol of victory, power, and success.
The former president’s promotional campaign for “Victory 45-47” emphasized these qualities, positioning the fragrance as a must-have for anyone who wants to embrace the strength and success that Trump claims to represent. However, Musk’s alleged comments have fueled doubts about the perfume’s true quality, especially when compared to luxury perfumes with a much higher price tag. Musk’s remarks have led many to wonder whether they are simply part of an ongoing strategy to create buzz or if they reflect a genuine disappointment with the product.Given Musk’s long-standing public persona as a connoisseur of high-end goods, his critique of Trump’s perfume has raised eyebrows. The idea that Musk, whose wealth and influence place him in an elite class of consumers, would openly mock a product linked to Trump has only deepened the intrigue surrounding this peculiar exchange.While Trump continues to market the fragrance as the embodiment of victory and strength, Musk’s comments have inevitably shifted the public discourse. The stark contrast between the two men’s views on what constitutes quality and luxury highlights the growing divide between them, despite their past cooperation.Musk has been a major player in the tech world, renowned for his forward-thinking and pioneering work in industries ranging from electric vehicles to space travel, and it is no surprise that he would hold higher standards when it comes to luxury items.
The issue of quality is not the only aspect of the perfume’s debut that has attracted attention. The launch of “Victory 45-47” has been positioned as more than just a fragrance—it’s presented as a brand statement, an extension of Trump’s personal legacy.For many, it’s symbolic of the former president’s branding power, his ability to create a marketable product out of almost anything related to his name. However, Musk’s sharp critique could undermine this narrative, casting a shadow over the perfume’s reputation and raising questions about the authenticity of the brand’s values.The public exchange of barbs between Musk and Trump over a fragrance may seem trivial to some, but it speaks to larger issues of branding, perception, and the public personas of the two men.Musk’s image is that of a visionary entrepreneur who doesn’t shy away from challenging established norms and taking risks—qualities that are often celebrated in his various ventures.Trump, on the other hand, has built a reputation as a larger-than-life figure who has used his name to create a vast array of products, from real estate to personal care items like the new perfume. The clash between these two powerful figures raises questions about authenticity in branding, and who gets to define what luxury and success truly mean.
Để lại một phản hồi